furniture teak
Cushion Furniture Teak
Related Topics:
teak furniture
furniture teak
teak patio furniture
teak outdoor furniture
teak bench
patio furniture
teak chair
teak table
discount teak furniture
teak garden furniture
teak chairs
garden furniture
teak benches
teak loungers
teak
teak wood patio furniture
outdoor furniture
teak tables
furniture
teak deck furniture
teak wood furniture
adirondack chairs
teak pool furniture
teak outdoor patio furniture
wood patio furniture
outdoor teak furniture
benches
teak wood
teak patio outdoor furniture
garden bench
Indonesian
teak outdoor garden furniture
teak steamer chair
teak patio chair
discount teak patio furniture
garden
discount patio furniture
deck furniture
indonesian teak furniture
chairs
|
Cushion Furniture Teak furniture teak
.
Cushion Furniture Teak furniture teak Information
For the fast several years an AIDS vaccine has been the key focus in AIDS
research. While the government sees the vaccine as a termination to the disease,
but a portion of the public along with many renowned scientists from around the
world would argue against a vaccine. The United Nations and the US military have
threatened to administer a mandatory vaccine to children at the age of 12 and
all military employees. Reports predict a massive resistance to a mandatory AIDS
vaccine in the US. (www.newsmax.shtml) The Committtee to Protect Medical Freedom
warned that the vaccine would infact put more people at risk of contracting the
deadly disease. AIDS is not like polio or smallpox, which can occur randomly
without any warning; the public already knows how to avoid this disease.
Coverage of ‘promising’ vaccines is extremely misleading, and those being
tested so far appear harmful and dangerous. (newsmax.com) Even with the
disparencies surrounding these vaccines, the National Institute for Allergy and
Infectious Diseases is sponsoring an HIV vaccine test on babies born to
HIV-infected mothers. The program has admitted that a small percentage of their
trial applicants have indeed become infected, but now have access to the best
medical care available. The available data on such vaccines gives no basis for
testing on humans. Scientists and Government officials have been debating on
this issue for many years now. However, the divergence of AIDS and HIV has a
long and tedious history full of twists and turns and dead end roads.
Little
to nothing was known about AIDS when it first erupted in the late 1970s. When
the epidemic finally reached noticeable proportions in the early 1980s, numerous
hypotheses emerged. “Theories attempting to explain the origin of the disease
ranged from the comic to the bizarre: a deadly germ escaped from a CIA
laboratory: God sent the plague down to punish homosexuals and drug addicts: it
came from outer space, riding on the tail of a comet.” (newdawnmagazine.com)
Though some of the theories were outlandish, a few hold ample evidence. Among
the theories dismissed and rejected by the government were those of covert human
medical experimentation and primate viruses. The government ignored all the
dangerous viral creations that were genetically altered for cancer research,
vaccine research, and secret biological warfare. (newdawnmagazine.com) There are
claims that the polio vaccine given to Africans in the late 1950s was prepared
using chimp kidney cells that were contaminated with the ancestor virus of HIV.
In the 1960s several prestigious labs were found to be contaminated with primate
viruses, including the National Cancer Institute and Fort Detrick. The hepatitis
B vaccine, which was also developed in chimps in Liberia, was first administered
to gays at the NY Blood Center. The lab also prides itself on releasing
“rehabilitated” chimps back into their natural habitats in Southern Africa. All
research files connecting the research has been secured and censored.
The
CDC (Center for Disease Control) and the NIH (National Institute of Health) may
have adopted the idea that AIDS was caused by a single infectious agent, HIV,
too quickly. There are countless despondencies in this theory, which have been
concealed from the public for almost two decades. The CDC and the NIH fail to
recognize obvious facts that bloster their hold on HIV and AIDS. For example,
AIDS includes 25 previously known diseases and two clinically and
epidemiological very different epidemics, one in Africa, and the other in
America and Europe. (virusmyth.net) Almost all American and European cases are
males over the age of twenty, while in Africa AIDS affects both sexes equally.
There is also a great deal of data documenting that the use of recreational and
anti-HIV drugs were sufficient for HIV-positives and HIV-positives to develop
the AIDS disease for Americans and Europeans. On the other hand, African AIDS
appears to be a result o protein malnutrition, poor sanitation, and subsequent
parasitic infections.
The virus hypotheisis also fails all conventional
criteria for causation and many AIDS patients have diseases that do not depend
on immunodeficiency, such as Kaposi’s sarcoma, lymphoma, and others. There is no
common, active microbe in all AIDS patients and there is both negative and
positive evidence that AIDS is not infectious. Over 100-fold different AIDS
risks in different risk groups show that HIV is not sufficient for AIDS.
(virusmyth.net)
One of the most influential questioners of the orthodox
linkage between HIV and AIDS controversy is Peter Duesberg, a German, American
scientist, professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of
California, Berkley. He is the man at the centre of the controversy in South
Africa and recognized for his research all around the world. Duesberg has been
called the self-styled Galileo of the modern age. He calims he is willing to
inject himself witht the virus to proove his heretical hypothosisi that it does
not carry AIDS.
Duesberg belives that “HIV and AIDS are nothing but a gross,
overblown and dangerously unisonous myth.” (virusmyth.net) To him, HIV is simply
a harmless retrovirus and neither HIV nor AIDS are infectious. He sees the AIDS
hysteria as a conspiracy between the medical establishments and drug companies
who have special interest in the HIV hypothesis. He was also one of the
forerunners to recognize the totally different characteristics between African
AIDS and American and E uropoean AIDS. The national scientific bodies of the
World have rejected Duesberg’s dissident theories and his findings have never
been released to the public.
Perhaps the second person to lead the way in
finding the missing pieces of the AIDS puzzle is John Lauriten, a
Harvard-trained survey researcher, social scientist and gay activist. He had the
expertise to notice that the CDC and the NIH were already “cooking” the AIDS
statistics to conceal the role or recreational drugs in causing the syndrome.”
(virusmyth.net) He found that the neither AIDS nor HIV held up the Koch’s
postulates, which are the standard rules in microbiology used to determine
whether a particular microbe causes a particular disease. Lauritsen has written
hundreds of papers and articles on his views of the false definition of AIDS and
“immune deficiency”. Lauristen also realized the AIDS health care providers,
service organizations, and maintream media were actually helping the epidemic to
progress.
Michael Fumento lost his job as the AIDS expert at the Commission
of Civil Rights when he began to argue that AIDS was not an epidemic to society
at all. He has published several books on the myths of AIDs and the media driven
psychology of the disease. Fumento disparages the statistical data put forth by
the media by arguing that the AIDS “epidemic has been on a steep decline since
1996 and can no longer be categorized as an epidemic at all. He also points out
that the funding for AIDS far exceeds that of Cancer and heart disease research,
while the number of people who die from these afflictions dwarf those of
AIDS.(fumento.com) He argues that the disease became a political rallying point
and has become a “bumper sticker disease”. The Government has exaggerated the
AIDS crisis in every way to make it more politically correct and bring more
money into the federal health agency coffers.(fumento.com)
|
